The Battle Against Martech ‘Enshittification’: How Businesses Are Fighting Back

Martech was introduced as a game-changer, offering businesses the tools to drive efficiency, enhance customer engagement and scale their operations. But the reality has often fallen short of expectations. What was meant to streamline processes has turned into a labyrinth of overcomplicated platforms, rising costs and fragmented workflows. Many of these platforms now add more complexity than value, with profit-driven decisions overriding user experience.
This phenomenon, called ‘enshittification,’ has created significant challenges for businesses. Growth has slowed, innovation has become harder and tools that once supported success are now hindering progress. As a result, marketers and developers are increasingly seeking solutions that prioritize flexibility, simplicity and seamless integration rather than outdated systems that create more problems than they solve.
Why usability matters more than brand hype
B2B marketers have learned that bold claims don’t always translate into real value. A well-known name or slick marketing campaign doesn’t guarantee a platform will integrate smoothly into a business’s workflow or that it will remain effective as needs change.
Instead of being swayed by vendor promises, businesses are relying more on peer insights, internal feedback and real-world user experiences. The most valuable perspectives often come from the developers and marketers who use these tools daily. Their first-hand experience offers a clearer picture of what enhances efficiency and what adds unnecessary complexity. Making smart martech investments starts with listening to those who engage with the technology every day, not just senior leaders who may be removed from its day-to-day impact.
One of the biggest risks businesses face is becoming too dependent on a single provider. Many large martech vendors operate within closed ecosystems that limit integration with external tools. This restricts flexibility and makes it harder for businesses to pivot when market conditions change.
The safest approach is to avoid long, rigid contracts that leave businesses trapped in outdated systems. If choosing a monolithic provider is unavoidable, break clauses should be a non-negotiable part of the contract, providing an exit strategy if the platform stops meeting the company’s needs.
A better long-term strategy is to take a composable approach where a business selects best-in-class tools that can be easily swapped or upgraded as requirements change. This ensures businesses remain agile and are able to refine their tech stack over time rather than being locked into a single provider’s roadmap.
The opportunity for martech startups
As businesses move away from restrictive platforms, martech startups have a real chance to step up. Flexibility is at the core of this shift. Businesses no longer want to be forced into rigid, one-size-fits-all systems. Instead, they need the freedom to build a tech stack that aligns with their specific requirements. Scalability is just as crucial and companies are looking for tools that grow with them and integrate smoothly with emerging technologies rather than becoming obsolete. Interoperability is also key with businesses favoring an API-first approach that allows them to connect different tools without friction.
Martech startups that embrace these principles can carve out a real competitive edge, giving businesses the adaptability and control they now expect.
Marketing Technology News: MarTech Interview with Maria Robinson, Chief Marketing Officer @ Airship
Why strong integrations are essential
A martech stack is only as effective as its ability to integrate. Without seamless connections between platforms, businesses risk creating silos that disrupt workflows, slow decision-making and weaken customer engagement.
The solution is to prioritize technology designed for interoperability. Businesses should seek out API-first tools that are built for connectivity, allowing them to adopt new technologies without overhauling their entire system. This ensures a smoother transition as market needs evolve, rather than being forced into rigid, vendor-controlled ecosystems.
At Storyblok, for example, we’ve built our headless CMS to integrate effortlessly with a wide range of technologies. By making it easy for businesses to connect their content across different platforms, we ensure they maintain flexibility without accumulating unnecessary technical debt.
As the martech landscape continues to change, businesses are increasingly refusing to be bound by restrictive ecosystems that stifle innovation. They are demanding greater control over their tech stacks and the ability to adapt quickly to new opportunities. Those that embrace this shift will find themselves well-positioned to lead the charge in scaling, innovating and staying ahead of the competition.
Ultimately, businesses that focus on usability, flexibility and integration will be the ones that thrive. By rejecting outdated, monolithic systems and taking control of their martech strategies, companies will ensure they can grow and adapt without being constrained by rigid, vendor-controlled environments.
The battle against ‘enshittification’ is about more than just avoiding flawed systems, it’s about helping businesses to make informed, strategic decisions that serve their unique needs, ensuring they have the flexibility and tools required to remain competitive in an ever-changing marketplace.
Marketing Technology News: Embracing Video Interactivity for a Competitive Edge in Advertising

Scroll to Top