On January 1, 2026, California launched the Delete Request Opt-Out Platform, better known as DROP. The tool allows the state’s 40 million residents to delete their personal information from more than 500 registered data brokers with a single click.
By August 1, when data brokers must begin processing these deletion requests every 45 days, the third-party data infrastructure that B2C marketers have relied upon for decades will become even more unreliable.
This isn’t a theoretical policy shift. It’s an operational one — and it demands immediate action.
Privacy rights go from theoretical to operational
Privacy rights have existed on paper for years. Exercising them was another matter.
A Consumer Reports study found that commercial data removal services achieved only 35% success rates within four months, with deleted data often reappearing weeks later. Consumers who wanted their information removed faced dozens of individual opt-out processes, each with different requirements.
DROP eliminates this friction entirely. Californians verify their identity through the state’s Identity Gateway, create a profile with their identifiers, and submit one request that reaches every registered data broker simultaneously. As Tom Kemp, executive director of CalPrivacy, stated in November 2025: “Californians will soon be able to delete their data from hundreds of data brokers with one simple action.”
The enforcement teeth are real. Data brokers must check DROP at least every 45 days, process matching records within 90 days, and maintain suppression lists to prevent re-collection. Penalties reach $200 per day per consumer for failure to comply. CalPrivacy has already demonstrated aggressive enforcement, fining Rickenbacher Data $45,000 and S&P Global $62,600 in January 2026 alone for registration violations.
Third-party data reliability collapses at scale
The math is unforgiving. DataGrail’s 2024 Privacy Trends Report documented a 246% increase in data subject requests from 2021 to 2023, with deletion requests accounting for more than 40% of all privacy requests. DROP will accelerate this trend dramatically.
Research published in Marketing Science found that ads served to opted-out users fetch 52% less revenue on exchanges than comparable ads for users who allow behavioral targeting. When deletion becomes frictionless, the degradation spreads across the entire data ecosystem.
“The Delete Act nullifies the assumption that data continues to circulate once it enters the market,” explains ClickPoint Software in its analysis. “Over time, that reduces upstream availability and makes third-party data less predictable.”
For B2C marketers, this means audience segments built on third-party data will shrink unpredictably. Lookalike models degrade. Traditional ad attribution experiences significant gaps. The infrastructure many teams depend on won’t fail catastrophically, it’s worse. Reporting will simply become progressively less accurate, making optimization decisions increasingly unreliable.
Marketing Technology News: MarTech Interview With Ethan Gustav, Group President, North America @ Infobip
Ad platforms cannot grade their own homework
The attribution challenge compounds the data reliability problem. Google and Meta cannot objectively measure their own performance — a structural conflict marketers have long accepted but can no longer afford to ignore.
“Measurement, interpretation, and insights around ad performance are monopolized by the platform — effectively a ‘grading their own homework’ setup,” notes Zefr’s industry analysis.
The double-counting problem illustrates the dysfunction. A user sees a Meta display ad, later searches on Google, and then “converts.” Both platforms report the “conversion” as attributed to their channel. Both take credit. In this case, marketers have no way to determine true incrementality.
Industry statistics paint a grim picture: 73% of marketers report significant attribution challenges since iOS 14.5. Only 57% of companies use any form of attribution model. At Cannes 2024, experts estimated only 6% of advertising drives measurable value — but current tools cannot identify which 6%.
The Q1 2026 checklist for marketing leaders
Marketing leaders who move in Q1 2026 will establish competitive advantages before the August compliance deadline forces their competitors to react. Here’s where to start:
Audit your data dependencies.
Map every campaign, audience segment, and attribution touchpoint that relies on third-party data. Identify which will degrade first.
Implement incrementality testing.
Move beyond platform-reported metrics. Establish 1P-based holdout groups, and geo-lift tests to measure true impact independent of walled garden attribution.
Accelerate first-party data collection.
Create direct value exchanges with customers — exclusive content, tools, or personalization — in exchange for voluntarily shared information.
Invest in media mix modeling.
Deploy cross-channel measurement that doesn’t depend on user-level tracking.
The competitive advantage of moving early
DROP creates a temporary asymmetry in the market. For the next six to 12 months, some marketers will operate with superior measurement infrastructure while their competitors don’t yet recognize the problem.
Consider what this means practically: While competitors waste budget optimizing campaigns based on platform-reported conversions that double-count the same sale, early movers will know true incrementality. While others chase vanity metrics, you’ll measure actual business impact. While they debate whether their ads work, you’ll have proof.
This advantage isn’t permanent — eventually, the market catches up. But the marketers who establish robust first-party measurement infrastructure in Q1 2026 will gain 12 to 18 months of better decision-making than competitors. In B2C marketing, that’s the difference between growth and stagnation.
First-party marketing software in a post-DROP world
The alternative path requires rebuilding measurement infrastructure around data you own. First-party marketing software aggregates customer data from owned properties — website behavior, purchase history, email engagement, app interactions — into unified profiles that don’t depend on third-party brokers.
McKinsey’s research quantifies the stakes: “Marketers and companies that do not figure out a strategy to maintain — and even grow — their access to first-party data may have to spend 10 to 20 percent more on marketing and sales to generate the same returns.”
Case studies demonstrate what becomes possible. Kia Motors achieved a 4x conversion rate improvement after reinventing their first-party data strategy. Shinola discovered through incrementality testing that Facebook was underreporting prospecting campaign performance by 413%. These results emerge when marketers escape walled garden dependency and measure what actually drives growth.
The August 2026 deadline isn’t just a compliance date for data brokers. It marks when the competitive gap widens between marketers who control their measurement infrastructure and those who depend on platforms with deteriorating data. Marketers who rebuild now won’t just survive DROP – they’ll finally measure what actually drives growth while competitors optimize on fictional attribution. That advantage compounds over time.
The window is open. The question is who moves first.
Marketing Technology News: Five Trends That Will Define Marketing in 2026